Streaming af e- og lydbøger Stream e- og lydbøger Prøv gratis

Wolves, Courts, and Public Policy

af

Du sparer 27% fra forlagets pris Du sparer 27% fra forlagets pris
Wolves, Courts, and Public Policy
  • Forlagets pris kr. 369,95
  • Leveringstid 5-9 hverdage
  • Forventet levering 05-07-2018
  • Bog, paperback (kr. 269,95) (kr. 269,95)
    1. Beskrivelse

      This book examines the controversial role of the courts in the policymaking process and resolution of public policy conflicts by analyzing the litigation regarding the reintroduction and recovery of the wolf in the Northern Rocky Mountains.

      Andre udgaver:

      Bog, hardback
      E-bog, ePub

    2. Yderligere info
      Udgivelsesdato:
      08-11-2016
      Sprog:
      Engelsk
      ISBN13:
      9781498502696
      Sidetal:
      260
      Vægt:
      367 g
      Højde:
      17 mm
      Bredde:
      151 mm
      Længde:
      230 mm
      Forlag:
      Lexington Books
      Mærkat:
      Bog, paperback
      Format:
      Paperback
      • Bibliotekernes beskrivelse

        This book examines the reintroduction and recovery of the wolf in the Northern Rocky Mountains. The wolf was driven to brink of extinction through conscious government policy. The Endangered Species Act of 1973 provided the means for wolf's return, which began in the Carter administration and continues in the Obama administration. The battle over the wolf is part of a larger struggle over the management of public lands, generating public law litigation. Interest groups brought suit in federal courts, challenging the Department of Interior's implementation of policy. The federal courts were required to interpret the statutory mandates and review Interior's decisions to insure statutory compliance. The analysis of this public law litigation demonstrates that the federal courts correctly interpreted the statutory mandates and properly supported and checked Interior's decisions. This book focuses on the controversial role of the courts in the resolution of public policy conflicts. Judicial skeptics argue that the courts should not get involved in complex public policy disputes as Judges lack the expertise and information to make informed decisions. Judicial proponents, by contrast, argue that judicial involvement is necessary so Federal courts can oversee federal agencies, which are under conflicting pressure from interest groups, the President, Congress, and their own internal dynamics. This book supports the conclusions of judicial proponents and points out that the federal courts have been instrumental in the return and recovery of the wolf to the Northern Rocky Mountains.

    3. Anmeldelser

      Kundernes boganmeldelser af Wolves, Courts, and Public Policy

    Fandt du ikke hvad du søgte?

    Hvis denne bog ikke er noget for dig, kan du benytte kategorierne nedenfor til at finde andre titler. Klik på en kategori for at se lignende bøger.